Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
domain
string
harmonic_pos
int64
harmonic_val
float64
pagerank_pos
int64
pagerank_val
float64
n_hosts
int64
googleapis.com
1
29,799,486
1
0.016263
2,920
facebook.com
2
29,780,850
3
0.009396
3,906
google.com
3
29,660,674
2
0.014278
37,909
instagram.com
4
26,877,164
5
0.006296
775
googletagmanager.com
5
26,254,582
4
0.007278
48
youtube.com
6
25,770,158
8
0.004838
1,640
twitter.com
7
24,761,336
10
0.004012
610
gstatic.com
8
24,708,790
7
0.005382
260
linkedin.com
9
24,467,486
11
0.003805
896
gmpg.org
10
24,016,472
9
0.004537
2
cloudflare.com
11
22,443,220
6
0.005907
735
gravatar.com
12
22,145,546
19
0.001831
99
apple.com
13
21,699,584
20
0.001768
3,297
pinterest.com
14
21,637,102
25
0.001266
303
wikipedia.org
15
21,596,978
42
0.000853
2,227
jsdelivr.net
16
21,512,476
18
0.001903
47
wordpress.org
17
21,394,334
16
0.001917
1,415
youtu.be
18
21,380,536
48
0.00076
10
x.com
19
21,292,872
21
0.001374
136
goo.gl
20
21,203,854
33
0.00101
837
whatsapp.com
21
21,101,334
22
0.001344
103
vimeo.com
22
21,036,766
45
0.000791
110
microsoft.com
23
21,016,474
36
0.000927
2,527
amazon.com
24
20,943,802
59
0.000554
1,083
wixstatic.com
25
20,928,854
15
0.001927
24
tiktok.com
26
20,915,180
47
0.000765
310
wordpress.com
27
20,879,122
37
0.000886
2,035,616
jquery.com
28
20,833,302
32
0.001095
62
europa.eu
29
20,832,650
52
0.000632
3,565
cloudfront.net
30
20,787,982
34
0.000977
88,880
mozilla.org
31
20,783,774
57
0.000579
1,083
amazonaws.com
32
20,765,534
43
0.00085
184,576
github.com
33
20,739,784
30
0.001133
6,191
blogspot.com
34
20,667,658
86
0.000337
4,202,402
adobe.com
35
20,651,234
31
0.001105
2,315
spotify.com
36
20,623,688
82
0.00035
572
bit.ly
37
20,607,034
83
0.000344
38
googleusercontent.com
38
20,597,494
64
0.000474
4,001
unpkg.com
39
20,557,730
29
0.001187
5
fontawesome.com
40
20,507,664
27
0.001248
46
github.io
41
20,443,708
69
0.000439
308,044
medium.com
42
20,438,926
77
0.000383
111,449
wa.me
43
20,436,176
41
0.000857
9
shopify.com
44
20,434,918
26
0.001261
296
w3.org
45
20,409,174
88
0.00033
178
t.me
46
20,366,138
60
0.000547
1,219
paypal.com
47
20,366,002
67
0.000457
159
reddit.com
48
20,361,822
117
0.000264
491
nih.gov
49
20,281,168
146
0.000186
3,066
creativecommons.org
50
20,277,240
119
0.000251
123
bootstrapcdn.com
51
20,271,982
35
0.000966
42
yahoo.com
52
20,269,808
149
0.000176
9,022
forbes.com
53
20,259,856
160
0.000152
864
google-analytics.com
54
20,248,398
65
0.000467
25
archive.org
55
20,217,768
128
0.000229
2,649
dropbox.com
56
20,187,614
168
0.000142
122
nytimes.com
57
20,182,758
162
0.000149
557
researchgate.net
58
20,165,588
208
0.000109
39
soundcloud.com
59
20,153,086
150
0.000174
133
tumblr.com
60
20,136,994
142
0.000193
679,270
who.int
61
20,131,766
196
0.000116
462
stripe.com
62
20,126,600
71
0.000423
91
zoom.us
63
20,103,308
159
0.000153
21,786
fbcdn.net
64
20,098,632
23
0.001313
13,975
office.com
65
20,080,992
111
0.000282
213
example.com
66
20,077,808
193
0.000118
8,056
doi.org
67
20,072,730
171
0.000138
96
unsplash.com
68
20,055,278
121
0.000249
51
flickr.com
69
20,048,320
157
0.000161
167
vk.com
70
20,045,536
76
0.000385
2,452
wired.com
71
20,040,762
372
0.000061
103
t.co
72
20,037,854
54
0.000607
5
ietf.org
73
20,036,686
175
0.000135
153
theguardian.com
74
20,029,260
207
0.000109
152
tinyurl.com
75
20,025,222
242
0.000095
43
statista.com
76
20,012,242
229
0.0001
79
weebly.com
77
20,006,188
125
0.000243
550,859
fb.com
78
20,001,862
56
0.000595
213
un.org
79
19,991,692
264
0.000085
855
theverge.com
80
19,991,402
400
0.000057
22
meta.com
81
19,987,198
49
0.000731
79
cnn.com
82
19,986,272
309
0.000073
480
linktr.ee
83
19,982,646
204
0.000112
29
live.com
84
19,982,194
165
0.000144
19,298
apache.org
85
19,979,952
96
0.000305
925
bbc.com
86
19,975,862
317
0.000071
85
techcrunch.com
87
19,973,016
302
0.000074
127
oracle.com
88
19,968,590
114
0.00027
533
android.com
89
19,964,206
297
0.000076
61
opera.com
90
19,963,734
141
0.000193
300
wp.com
91
19,963,042
75
0.000391
120
youtube-nocookie.com
92
19,959,576
154
0.000168
14
cdc.gov
93
19,959,072
243
0.000094
376
openai.com
94
19,955,232
292
0.000077
167
wixsite.com
95
19,948,348
153
0.000169
477,469
harvard.edu
96
19,948,008
290
0.000078
10,327
bbc.co.uk
97
19,940,438
311
0.000072
279
springer.com
98
19,936,564
276
0.000082
129
wsj.com
99
19,934,898
312
0.000072
312
mailchimp.com
100
19,927,912
180
0.000128
150
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Common Crawl Domain Ranks

Web domains ranked by harmonic centrality and PageRank, ready to prioritize a crawl

What is it?

This dataset is the domain-level ranking from Common Crawl's hyperlink web graph, republished as clean Parquet. Common Crawl builds a graph of which domains link to which, then scores every domain by harmonic centrality and PageRank. A high rank means many other well-connected domains link to it, which is a solid proxy for importance when you decide what to crawl or trust first.

We take the ranks as they are and republish them with no changes to the numbers. The one edit is convenience: the source keys each row by a reversed host string (com.example), and we un-reverse it into a plain domain (example.com). The rows stay in the source's rank order, so part-000 holds the highest-centrality domains and rank falls as the part number rises.

Right now it holds 3 releases across 364,498,964 domains in 5.8 GB of compressed Parquet, cut into 74 shards. New quarterly releases are added as Common Crawl publishes them.

Harmonic centrality and PageRank are two ways to answer the same question: how central is a domain in the web's link graph. Because the file is pre-sorted by harmonic centrality, reading from the top gives you the most important domains first, which is exactly what you want when seeding a crawl, building an allow-list, or picking a high-signal sample of the web.

It is released under the Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0, the same license Common Crawl uses.

What is being released?

Each web-graph release is one directory of rank-ordered shards. Each shard holds a fixed number of rows, so a domain's rank position is just shard index times shard size plus its row offset.

data/
  cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/
    part-000.parquet          highest-centrality domains
    part-001.parquet
    ...
stats.csv                     one row per committed release

Read part-000 first for the most important domains. stats.csv tracks every committed release with its shard count, domain count, Parquet size, source size, and shard-row size, so coverage and remaining work are easy to read off.

Breakdown by release

Domains per release, newest first.

  cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may    ███████████████████░  118.8M
  cc-main-2026-feb-mar-apr    ████████████████████  124.6M
  cc-main-2026-apr-may-jun    ███████████████████░  121.1M

How to download and use this dataset

Read the top of a release for the most important domains, or stream the whole ranking. It is a standard Hugging Face Parquet layout, so it works with DuckDB, datasets, pandas, and huggingface_hub out of the box.

Using DuckDB

DuckDB reads Parquet directly from Hugging Face, no download step needed.

-- Top 50 domains by harmonic centrality
SELECT domain, harmonic_pos, harmonic_val
FROM read_parquet('hf://datasets/open-index/ccrawl-domains/data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/*.parquet')
ORDER BY harmonic_pos
LIMIT 50;
-- Where does one domain rank?
SELECT domain, harmonic_pos, pagerank_pos
FROM read_parquet('hf://datasets/open-index/ccrawl-domains/data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/*.parquet')
WHERE domain = 'wikipedia.org';
-- Most central .org domains
SELECT domain, harmonic_pos
FROM read_parquet('hf://datasets/open-index/ccrawl-domains/data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/*.parquet')
WHERE domain LIKE '%.org'
ORDER BY harmonic_pos
LIMIT 20;
-- Domains where PageRank and harmonic centrality disagree most
SELECT domain, harmonic_pos, pagerank_pos,
       abs(harmonic_pos - pagerank_pos) AS gap
FROM read_parquet('hf://datasets/open-index/ccrawl-domains/data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/*.parquet')
ORDER BY gap DESC
LIMIT 20;

Using datasets

from datasets import load_dataset

# Stream the ranking, most important domains first
ds = load_dataset("open-index/ccrawl-domains", split="train", streaming=True)
for row in ds:
    print(row["harmonic_pos"], row["domain"])

# Load one release by name
ds = load_dataset("open-index/ccrawl-domains", name="cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may", split="train", streaming=True)

Using huggingface_hub

from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download

# Download one release
snapshot_download(
    "open-index/ccrawl-domains",
    repo_type="dataset",
    local_dir="./ccrawl-domains/",
    allow_patterns="data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/*.parquet",
)

For faster downloads, install pip install huggingface_hub[hf_transfer] and set HF_HUB_ENABLE_HF_TRANSFER=1.

Using the CLI

# Download just the top shard of the latest release
huggingface-cli download open-index/ccrawl-domains \
    --include "data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/part-000.parquet" \
    --repo-type dataset --local-dir ./ccrawl-domains/

Dataset statistics

Release Shards Domains Parquet Size Source Size
cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may 24 118,760,321 1.8 GB 2.3 GB
cc-main-2026-feb-mar-apr 25 124,646,710 1.8 GB 2.4 GB
cc-main-2026-apr-may-jun 25 121,091,933 2.1 GB 2.4 GB
Total 74 364,498,964 5.8 GB

How this dataset is built

The pipeline is a single Go binary. It streams the release's one gzipped ranks table top to bottom, un-reverses each host key into a plain domain, cuts a new Zstandard Parquet shard at a fixed row count in exact rank order, and commits shards to the hub in batches, deleting each local file right after its commit so disk stays flat. The parse, shard, and commit stages run concurrently as the stream flows, so the elapsed figure below is end-to-end publish wall-clock for the release, not the sum of isolated phase timings. The source has no shard count known ahead of the stream, so the run learns the release is whole only when the stream reaches its end.

Live numbers for the newest release cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may:

  • Input: 2.3 GB of gzipped source ranks, streamed once, never buffered whole
  • Output: 1.8 GB of Zstandard Parquet across 24 shards, so the Parquet is about 1.3x smaller than the gzipped source, 76% of its size
  • Domains: 118,760,321 domains
  • Elapsed: 15m of publish wall-clock, from the first shard commit to the latest
  • Speed: 99 shards/hour, 490.3M domains/hour
  • Status: complete, the stream was read to its end

Dataset card for Common Crawl Domain Ranks

Dataset summary

A faithful Parquet mirror of Common Crawl's domain-level web-graph ranks. Each quarterly release ranks every domain in the crawl by harmonic centrality and PageRank, and we republish that ranking in source order, shard for shard. People use it for:

  • Crawl prioritization - start from the most central domains and work down
  • Allow-lists and seed lists - a ranked, license-clean list of real domains
  • Web-graph research - study centrality, PageRank, and how the two disagree
  • Sampling - take a high-signal slice of the web by rank threshold
  • Reputation features - centrality as a cheap prior for domain trust

Dataset structure

Data instances

One row is one domain and its ranks:

{
  "domain": "wikipedia.org",
  "harmonic_pos": 1,
  "harmonic_val": 29491890.0,
  "pagerank_pos": 3,
  "pagerank_val": 0.0024193,
  "n_hosts": 4821
}

Data fields

Column Type Description
domain VARCHAR registrable domain, un-reversed from the source host key
harmonic_pos BIGINT rank position by harmonic centrality, 1 is highest
harmonic_val DOUBLE harmonic centrality score
pagerank_pos BIGINT rank position by PageRank, 1 is highest
pagerank_val DOUBLE PageRank score
n_hosts BIGINT number of hosts aggregated into this domain

Data splits

One named config per release, plus a default config that globs every release. Each loads its shards as a single train split, in rank order.

# One release by config name
ds = load_dataset("open-index/ccrawl-domains", name="cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may", split="train")

# A specific release by path
ds = load_dataset("open-index/ccrawl-domains", data_files="data/cc-main-2026-mar-apr-may/*.parquet", split="train")

Dataset creation

Why we built this

Common Crawl publishes the domain ranks as a single large gzipped TSV per release, keyed by a reversed host string. That is fine for a one-off download but awkward to query and to load a slice of. We republish it as rank-ordered Parquet with un-reversed domains so you can read the top of the ranking directly, query it from DuckDB, or stream it with datasets, without downloading the whole file first.

Source data

Everything comes from Common Crawl's hyperlink web graph, the domain-level rank tables. Source format is a single gzip-compressed, tab-separated file per release, pre-sorted by harmonic centrality, with columns for harmonic position and value, PageRank position and value, the reversed host, and the host count.

Processing steps

The pipeline is written in Go. For each release:

  1. Stream the gzipped ranks TSV top to bottom, never buffering the whole file
  2. Parse each row, un-reversing the host key (com.example becomes example.com)
  3. Cut a new Zstandard-compressed Parquet shard every fixed number of rows, keeping rank order exact
  4. Skip shards already on the hub while still reading through the stream, so ordering never drifts
  5. Commit finished shards in batches to Hugging Face, with stats.csv and this card
  6. Delete each local shard right after its commit lands, so disk stays flat

The only change to the data is un-reversing the host string into a plain domain. The rank numbers, the row order, and the set of domains match the source release exactly. All Parquet files use Zstandard compression.

Personal and sensitive information

The data is domain names and their ranks. It contains no personal data beyond what a domain name itself reveals.

Considerations for using the data

Social impact

A readable, ranked list of domains makes it easy to prioritize crawling, build seed lists, and study the shape of the web's link graph without heavy tooling.

Biases

Centrality reflects the link structure Common Crawl observed, which reflects what it crawled. Well-linked, long-established, English-language, and commercial domains tend to rank higher, and the ranking amplifies existing prominence. A high rank means well connected, not trustworthy or high quality. We did not correct for any of this.

Known limitations

  • Domain level, not host level. Ranks are aggregated to the registrable domain; n_hosts says how many hosts fed into each one.
  • Snapshot per release. Each quarterly release is a point-in-time view; ranks shift between releases.
  • Two metrics can disagree. Harmonic centrality and PageRank measure related but different things; a domain can rank very differently under each.
  • Coverage follows the crawl. Domains Common Crawl did not reach are not in the graph.

Additional information

Licensing

Released under the Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0, the same terms Common Crawl publishes under. Please credit Common Crawl when you use this data.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by Common Crawl.

Thanks

All the data here comes from Common Crawl, which builds the web graph and gives it away for free. None of this would exist without their work.

Contact

Questions, feedback, or issues, open a discussion on the Community tab.

Last updated: 2026-07-23 04:25 UTC

Downloads last month
108